|
Non-Indemnification Policy Statement
The University of Kentucky (UK)
Risk Management Committee (RMC) administers
a
self insurance program to protect its physicians from medical
malpractice claims, which may result from their participation in the
conduct of clinical trials. RMC review is required for all clinical
trials where the sponsor does not provide indemnification for medical
malpractice liability, with the exception of trials that meet the
exclusion criteria detailed below. RMC review assesses the medical
malpractice liability for conducting a clinical trial. RMC review also
determines whether the protection of this program will be given to a
clinical researcher for medical malpractice claims that may arise from
participation in a particular clinical trial. Medical malpractice
liability protection is contingent on RMC review and approval of
proposed clinical trials.
It is the responsibility of the principal investigator to initiate the
non-indemnification review process for all eligible clinical trials, as defined below, by directing the proposed clinical trial
protocol to one of the following three review committees: (1) the
Markey Cancer Center Protocol Review Committee (PRC) for cancer clinical
trials; (2) the CR-DOC Protocol Review Committee for
investigator-initiated NIH-sponsored clinical trials, which are not
multicenter cooperative clinical trials; and (3) the Non-indemnified
Non-cancer Protocol Review Committee for all other non-indemnified
trials. Electronic submissions via email are preferred and may help
expedite this process.
NOTE:
Contact Dr. John S. Thompson (Tel: 859.281.4927; Email:
jsthom1@uky.edu) for any questions regarding protocol eligibility or
the non-indemnification submission/review process.
I.
Features of Clinical Trials requiring RMC Review
Inclusion
criteria:
1.
All
clinical trials (investigator-initiated and industry-sponsored) for
which a drug, device, investigative procedure or financial support are
provided but indemnification is not provided.
2.
Investigator initiated NIH-supported clinical trials that are not
cooperative clinical trials.
3.
Orphan drug trials that are not indemnified.
4.
Clinical trials for which the PI is a UK/VA employee, which also involve
the participation of non-UK/VA health care providers.
5.
Clinical trials that present no/minimal physical risks to the study
subjects but have the potential for institutional legal liability based
on prevailing social, political or ethical issues.
Exclusion criteria:
1.
All
NIH/NCI/VA multicenter cooperative clinical trials.
2.
Other multicenter clinical trials, including industry sponsored trials,
which have an external Data Safety Monitoring Board.
3.
All
protocols that have been granted an IRB exemption.
4.
All
protocols that have been granted an expedited IRB approval.
5.
All
protocols that do not require IRB review.
6.
Industry supported clinical trials, where the sponsor provides
indemnification.
II.
Instructions for submission to the appropriate review committee:
The
Principal Investigator (PI) is responsible for assessing whether or not
a clinical trial needs to undergo review by the RMC.
A
scientific review needs to be completed by the appropriate one of the
following three committees.
Scientific Review Committees
Non-indemnified Non-cancer Protocol Review Committee
Chairperson: John Slevin, MD
This committee reviews clinical trials that do not have to go through
the Markey Cancer Center Protocol Review committee or the CR-DOC
Protocol Review committee. For questions regarding submitting to this
committee contact John Slevin (Chairperson) Email:
jslevin@uky.edu; Phone: 859.281.4920.
The
Clinical Project Risk Assessment Evaluation Form and the Routing Form
are located on the CCTS web site:
www.ccts.uky.edu (UK Research Policies) or see OSPA:
www.research.uky.edu/ospa/site.html (Non-indemnified Trials).
To
submit an application for review:
1.
Complete sections I, II, III of the Clinical Project Risk Assessment
Evaluation Form.
2.
Complete Investigator Name/Date and protocol title on the Routing Form.
3.
Submit the completed Clinical Project Risk Assessment Evaluation Form,
Routing Form, study protocol and draft informed consent to Dr. John
Slevin via email to
jslevin@email.uky.edu.
4.
Once Dr. Slevin has completed his review, he will sign and date the
routing form and forward the routing form and the Clinical Project Risk
Assessment Evaluation Form to Dr. John Thompson.
Markey Cancer Center Protocol Review
Committee
Chairperson: Jeff Moscow, MD Phone (859) 323-0239 Email: jmoscow@email.uky.edu
This committee reviews all cancer-related clinical trials. For
questions regarding submissions to this committee contact Katie Bugg (PRC
Coordinator) Email: Katie.bugg@uky.edu Phone: (859) 257-8213.
The
New Protocol Registration Form is located at
markey.uky.edu/crcc/documents/PRCSubmissionForm.pdf.
The Routing form is located on the CCTS web site:
www.ccts.uky.edu
(UK Research Policies) or see OSPA:
www.research.uky.edu/ospa/site.html
(Non-indemnified Trials).
To
submit an application for review:
-
Complete the New Protocol Registration Form.
-
Complete the Investigator Name/Date and protocol title on the
Routing Form.
-
Submit the completed New Protocol Registration Form, the Routing
Form, draft informed consent and an electronic copy of the protocol
via email to
Katie.Bugg@uky.edu.
-
Once the Committee has completed their review and assigned a Risk
Assessment score, the PRC Coordinator will complete the PRC memo,
routing form, Risk Assessment and obtain the appropriate signatures
from the Chair or his designee. (Sections I and II of the Risk
Assessment form will be sent to the PI for review and approval).
-
Upon full completion and approval of the Risk Assessment form, the
PRC Coordinator will submit the following to Dr. John Thompson:
protocol, PRC memo(s), Risk Assessment form, routing form, and draft
consent form.
CR-DOC
Protocol Review Committee
Chairperson: Tom Getchell, PhD
This committee reviews all clinical trials that utilize the CR-DOC. For
questions regarding submissions to this committee contact Tom Getchell
(Chair) Email:
tgetche1@uky.edu
Phone: (859) 257-1412, ext. 321.
A
link to the Clinical Project Risk Assessment form and Routing form are
located at www.mc.uky.edu/gcrc/Home.aspx under
“application process”.
To
submit an application for review:
1.
Complete sections I, II, III of the Clinical Project Risk Assessment
Evaluation Form.
2.
Complete the Investigator Name/Date and protocol title on the Routing
Form.
3.
Submit the completed Clinical Project Risk Assessment Evaluation Form,
study protocol and draft informed consent to:
alcose0@uky.edu
(Abby Cosentino).
4.
Once Dr. Getchell has completed his review, he will sign and date the
routing form and forward the routing form and the Risk Assessment to Dr.
John Thompson.
The
PI should forward a copy of the IRB approval and the IRB approved,
stamped consent form to Dr. Thompson upon receipt. The Review process
cannot continue until Dr. Thompson has received these documents.
Dr. Thompson will communicate any necessary changes or initial concerns
to the Principal Investigator via email.
Dr.
Thompson will review the Scientific Review Committee’s assessment, the
routing form, protocol, IRB approval letter, stamped consent, and will
prepare a summary and recommendation and forward to legal counsel.
Legal counsel will assess the submission and recommend either an
expedited or full review by the Risk Management
Committee, which meets monthly.
After the Risk Management Committee’s review, legal counsel will notify
the Principal Investigator and/or their designee (if applicable),
Department Chair and Scientific Review Committee Chairperson of the
status of their protocol via email. Legal counsel will send the
original signed routing form to the Principal Investigator and/or their
designee for filing in the regulatory file. Upon receipt of this
approval, the PI may proceed with the steps necessary to initiate the
protocol.
Even though IRB approval has been obtained, if the Risk Management
Committee has not given approval, THE TRIAL MUST NOT BE STARTED.
If
an investigator does not forward a trial for review that qualifies for
Inclusion in the Indemnification Process and a problem occurs and a
claim is made, the University is not obligated to defend the
investigator.
III. Flow Chart Points to Consider:
1.
If
a clinical trial meets the criteria for RMC review, start the process
outlined in the flow chart immediately so that this proceeds in parallel
with the IRB approval and Contract (if applicable).
2.
Although there are occasions when Sponsored Projects may eventually
obtain indemnification, do not delay your protocol by waiting for this
to occur. This may happen on rare occasions and on these occasions the
work by the Scientific Review Committees will have been unnecessary —
but this is worth the effort to generally move the process forward as
quickly as possible.
3.
Electronic submission to the appropriate scientific review committee
will help expedite this process.
IV.
Appeal Process
If
the protocol does not receive RMC approval, the PI can make revisions to
address the RMC’s concerns and resubmit to the RMC for reconsideration.

|